Age at introduction of complementary foods Measurement: proportion participants with event · children of complementary feeding age
Educational intervention probably leads to lower age at introduction of complementary foods Measurement: proportion… compared with no educational intervention (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Stunting · children of complementary feeding age
Educational intervention showed no clear difference in nutritional status: stunting (H/LAZ ≤ −2 SD) Measurement: proportion… compared with no educational intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Wasting · children of complementary feeding age
Educational intervention showed no clear difference in nutritional status: wasting (WH/LZ ≤ −2 SD) Measurement: proportion… compared with no educational intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Underweight · children of complementary feeding age
Educational intervention showed no clear difference in nutritional status: underweight (WAZ ≤ −2 SD) Measurement:… compared with no educational intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Duration of exclusive breastfeeding (≥ 4 months of age) Measurement: proportion of participants with event · children of complementary feeding age
It is very uncertain whether educational intervention changes duration of exclusive breastfeeding (≥ 4 months of age) Measurement:… compared with no educational intervention (very low certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
RR 1.58 [0.77, 3.22]
3 studies · 1544 participants
Very low
RR 2.32 [1.45, 3.73]
2 studies · 1167 participants
Low
RR 0.95 [0.7, 1.29]
1 study · 377 participants
Low
Hygiene practices: community‐based intervention Measurement: proportion of participants with event · children of complementary feeding age
Educational intervention probably leads to higher hygiene practices: community‐based intervention Measurement:… compared with no educational intervention (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Weight (kg) · children of complementary feeding age
2 findings from 1 review
Height (cm) · children of complementary feeding age
2 findings from 1 review
Bone mineral density · General practitioners/family doctors involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis
Primary care physician alerting system showed no clear difference in bone mineral density1 compared with primary care physician alerting system and a patient‐directed… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Medication2 · General practitioners/family doctors involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis
Primary care physician alerting system showed no clear difference in medication2 compared with primary care physician alerting system and a patient‐directed… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Bone mineral density · General practitioners/family doctors involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis
Primary care physician alerting system and a patient‐directed… leads to higher bone Mineral Density 1 compared with standard care (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Osteoporosis medication 2 · General practitioners/family doctors involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis
Primary care physician alerting system and a patient‐directed… leads to higher osteoporosis medication 2 compared with standard care (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Primary outcome ‐ reintegration Promote inclusion and reintegration Increase literacy and numeracy IIncrease access to education and employment · street‐connected children and young people
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Primary: Child Intellectual development (attainment of educational goals) · children younger than five years of age
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Overall survival · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Time to detection of recurrence · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Anxiety · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Depression · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Costs · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low