Complete wound healing · participants with corneal abrasion
Patching showed no clear difference in complete healing after 24 hours compared with no patching (low certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
Time to complete healing · participants with corneal abrasion
Patching showed no clear difference in days to complete healing compared with no patching (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pain at 24 hours · participants with corneal abrasion
Patching showed no clear difference in pain at 24 hours compared with no patching (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life · participants with corneal abrasion
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects1 · participants with corneal abrasion
Patching showed no clear difference in adverse effects1 compared with no patching (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Visual acuity · participants with corneal abrasion
1 finding from 1 review
Stereoacuity at distance Loss of ≥ 2 octaves near stereoacuity Measured using the Preschool Randot test 3 years after surgery · people with intermittent exotropia, aged less than 11 years
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Motor alignment at distance fixation Measured using PACT at 6 months · people with intermittent exotropia, aged less than 11 years
Patching showed no clear difference in motor alignment at distance fixation Measured using PACT at 6 months compared with active observation (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Motor fusion test · people with intermittent exotropia, aged less than 11 years
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of surgery that does not require further intervention · people with intermittent exotropia, aged less than 11 years
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life measures Measured at 3 years using the IXTQ scores for children, parents, or parent proxies (i.e. parents' perception of their children's quality of life). Scores could range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of l... · people with intermittent exotropia, aged less than 11 years
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Motor alignment at near fixation Measured using PACT at 6 months · people with intermittent exotropia, aged less than 11 years
Patching showed no clear difference in motor alignment at near fixation Measured using PACT at 6 months compared with active observation (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Stereoacuity at near · people with intermittent exotropia, aged less than 11 years
Patching showed no clear difference in stereoacuity at near Measured using the Preschool Randot, Titmus… compared with active observation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Visual acuity · people with traumatic hyphema
Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in short‐term visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/60 at end of… compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Final visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/50; monocular vs binocular eye patching · people with traumatic hyphema
Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in final visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/50; monocular vs binocular… compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Risk of secondary hemorrhage; monocular versus binocular eye patching · people with traumatic hyphema
Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in risk of secondary hemorrhage; monocular vs binocular eye patching compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review