Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

22 questions · 22 findings · 4 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

No studies found 9 · 40.9%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 4.5%Low 11 · 50%Moderate 1 · 4.5%High 0 · 0%

Intervention not reported

Hospital length of stay (patients recovering from orthopaedic surgery) · patients recovering from surgery who otherwise would require acute hospital inpatient care

The intervention showed no clear difference in hospital length of stay (patients recovering from orthopaedic surgery) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Use of health services · adolescents between 12 and 19 years with any chronic condition requiring ongoing clinical care, who are leaving or transitioning from…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Self‐Care Practice (Denyes Self‐Care Practice Instrument (DSCPI) · adolescents between 12 and 19 years with any chronic condition requiring ongoing clinical care, who are leaving or transitioning from…
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Disease‐specific outcomes · adolescents between 12 and 19 years with any chronic condition requiring ongoing clinical care, who are leaving or transitioning from…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Disease specific status (Activity index, clinical inventory) · adolescents between 12 and 19 years with any chronic condition requiring ongoing clinical care, who are leaving or transitioning from…
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Well‐being measures · adolescents between 12 and 19 years with any chronic condition requiring ongoing clinical care, who are leaving or transitioning from…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

The introduction of nursing assistive personnel (NAP) to the hospital workforce vs usual staffing

Patient readmissions · patients admitted to a cardiovascular surgery/urology/ophthalmology unit, a kidney transplant/plastic surgery unit, an oncology unit, or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

The introduction of nursing assistive personnel (NAP) to the hospital workforce vs usual staffing

Patient attendances at the ED · patients admitted to a cardiovascular surgery/urology/ophthalmology unit, a kidney transplant/plastic surgery unit, an oncology unit, or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

The introduction of nursing assistive personnel (NAP) to the hospital workforce vs usual staffing

Length of stay · patients admitted to a cardiovascular surgery/urology/ophthalmology unit, a kidney transplant/plastic surgery unit, an oncology unit, or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

The introduction of nursing assistive personnel (NAP) to the hospital workforce vs usual staffing

Patients with pressure ulcers · patients admitted to a cardiovascular surgery/urology/ophthalmology unit, a kidney transplant/plastic surgery unit, an oncology unit, or…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review