Major bleeding · patients with active cancer with venous thromboembolism
Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in major bleeding compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor bleeding · patients with active cancer with venous thromboembolism
Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in minor bleeding compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Thrombocytopenia · patients with active cancer with venous thromboembolism
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Health related quality of life · patients with active cancer with venous thromboembolism
1 finding from 1 review
All‐cause mortality · patients with active cancer with venous thromboembolism
Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Recurrent venous thromboembolism · patients with active cancer with venous thromboembolism
Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in recurrent venous thromboembolism compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Outcome: · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Mortality at 6 months: main analysis · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy
Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) prophylaxis showed no clear difference in mortality at 6 months: main analysis compared with no prophylaxis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
All‐cause mortality · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy
Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) prophylaxis showed no clear difference in mortality compared with no prophylaxis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pulmonary embolism · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy
It is very uncertain whether vitamin K antagonist (VKA) prophylaxis changes pulmonary embolism compared with no prophylaxis (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Symptomatic DVT · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy
It is very uncertain whether vitamin K antagonist (VKA) prophylaxis changes symptomatic deep vein thrombosis compared with no prophylaxis (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Major bleeding · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy
Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) prophylaxis probably leads to higher major bleeding compared with no prophylaxis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor bleeding · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy
Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) prophylaxis probably leads to higher minor bleeding compared with no prophylaxis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life ‐ not reported · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found