Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

11 questions · 11 findings · 5 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 27.3%Low 1 · 9.1%Moderate 5 · 45.5%High 2 · 18.2%

Open trial vs blinded trial

Number recruited · individuals eligible for a trial

Open trial leads to higher number recruited compared with blinded trial (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.25 [1.18, 1.34]
2 studies · 4833 participants
High

Endometrial resection or ablation vs open hysterectomy

Effectiveness Proportion of women with perception of improvement of bleeding symptoms · HMB

Endometrial resection or ablation probably leads to lower effectiveness Woman's perception (proportion with improvement in… compared with open hysterectomy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.9 [0.84, 0.95]
2 studies · 247 participants
Moderate

Endometrial resection or ablation vs open hysterectomy

Quality of life SF‐36 at 2 years – general health perception · HMB

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 155 participants
Moderate

Endometrial resection or ablation vs open hysterectomy

Requirement for further surgery for treatment failure within 1 year after surgery · HMB

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 247 participants
Moderate

Endometrial resection or ablation vs open hysterectomy

Acceptability Proportion satisfied with treatment · HMB

Endometrial resection or ablation showed no clear difference in acceptability Proportion satisfied with treatment compared with open hysterectomy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.91 [0.82, 1]
1 study · 194 participants
Moderate

Endometrial resection or ablation vs open hysterectomy

Safety Any serious adverse event · HMB

Endometrial resection or ablation showed no clear difference in safety Any serious adverse events compared with open hysterectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.29 [0.32, 5.2]
2 studies · 247 participants
Low

Endometrial resection or ablation vs open hysterectomy

Return to normal activity · HMB

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 194 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

the toxic and side effects of leukopenia after chemotherapy(no special data in trial of Zhang 2006) · patients with induction of remission in advanced or late gastric cancer

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes the toxic and side effects of leukopenia after chemotherapy(no… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chinese herbal medicines for induction of remission in advanced or late gastric cancer 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.32 [0.21, 0.5]
6 studies · 388 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

the toxic and side effects of leukopenia after chemotherapy(no special data in trial of Jia 2003, Zhang 2009) · patients with induction of remission in advanced or late gastric cancer

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes the toxic and side effects of leukopenia after chemotherapy(no… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chinese herbal medicines for induction of remission in advanced or late gastric cancer 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.43 [0.23, 0.8]
4 studies · 242 participants
Very low

Pathogen‐reduced platelets vs standard platelets

Number of platelet transfusions per participant up to 30 days from study entry · thrombocytopenia

1 finding from 1 review

Pathogen‐reduced platelets for the prevention of bleeding 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 1509 participants
High

Pulmonary artery perfusion with blood vs no perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass

Last measured PaO2/FiO2 ratio (mmHg) in all trials, irrespective of overall risk of bias · adult surgical patients with the need for cardiopulmonary bypass‐dependent heart surgery

1 finding from 1 review

Pulmonary artery perfusion versus no perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass for open heart surgery in adults 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 119 participants
Very low