Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

10 questions · 10 findings · 2 reviews · Urology

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 6 · 60%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 10%Low 3 · 30%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy · Serious adverse events (Surgery‐related mortality)
  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2.04 [0.19, 22.34]
  1 study · 541 participants
  Low
Related · question page
- Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy · Time‐to‐death of any cause (anticipated absolute effects refer to all‐cause mortality; median
  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 1.5 [1.03, 2.18]
  1 study · 541 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy · Time‐to‐recurrence (anticipated absolute effects refer to recurrence; median
  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 1.37 [0.58, 3.24]
  1 study · 541 participants
  Low
Related · question page
- Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy · Permanent haemodialysis ‐ not measured
  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found
Related · question page
- Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy · Quality of Life ‐ not measured
  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Prostatic massage vs no intervention

Prostatitis symptoms · participants with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 44 participants
Very low

Prostatic massage vs no intervention

Adverse events ‐ not reported · participants with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Prostatic massage vs no intervention

Sexual dysfunction ‐ not reported · participants with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Prostatic massage vs no intervention

Quality of life ‐ not reported · participants with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Prostatic massage vs no intervention

Depression and anxiety ‐ not reported · participants with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy

Time to death from any cause (absolute effects: overall mortality)

Partial nephrectomy may leads to higher time‐to‐death of any cause (anticipated absolute effects refer to… compared with radical nephrectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
HR 1.5 [1.03, 2.18]
1 study · 541 participants
Low

Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy

Serious adverse events (Surgery‐related mortality)

Partial nephrectomy showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Surgery‐related mortality) compared with radical nephrectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.04 [0.19, 22.34]
1 study · 541 participants
Low

Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy

Time to recurrence

Partial nephrectomy showed no clear difference in time‐to‐recurrence (anticipated absolute effects refer to… compared with radical nephrectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
HR 1.37 [0.58, 3.24]
1 study · 541 participants
Low

Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy

Permanent haemodialysis ‐ not measured

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy

Quality of life ‐ not measured

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found