Cochrane · systematic review · CD012045
Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses
Kunath, F, Schmidt, S, Krabbe, LM, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library
UrologyAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
3
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 40%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 60%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Partial nephrectomy compared to radical nephrectomy for clinical localized renal masses
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Time‐to‐death of any cause (anticipated absolute effects refer to all‐cause mortality; median Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy | HR 1.5 [1.03, 2.18] | 1 study · 541 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Serious adverse events (Surgery‐related mortality) Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy | RR 2.04 [0.19, 22.34] | 1 study · 541 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Time‐to‐recurrence (anticipated absolute effects refer to recurrence; median Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy | HR 1.37 [0.58, 3.24] | 1 study · 541 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Permanent haemodialysis ‐ not measured Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Quality of Life ‐ not measured Partial nephrectomy vs radical nephrectomy | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |