Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

34 questions · 37 findings · 3 reviews · HIV/AIDS · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 11 · 29.7%Low 7 · 18.9%Moderate 14 · 37.8%High 5 · 13.5%

Intervention not reported

Death or lost to care · HIV infected patients

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes death or lost to care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Death or lost to care · HIV‐infected patients

The intervention showed no clear difference in death or lost to care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

Consistent application of condom by FSWs · sex workers

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use showed no clear difference in consistent application of condom by FSWs compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

HIV knowledge among FSWs at 6‐month · sex workers

It is very uncertain whether social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use changes HIV knowledge among FSWs at 6‐month compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

Psychosocial barriers to condom use among FSWs at 6‐month · sex workers

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use showed no clear difference in psychosocial barriers to condom use among FSWs at 6‐month compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

Psychosocial barriers to condom use self‐efficacy among FSWs at 6‐month · sex workers

It is very uncertain whether social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use changes psychosocial barriers to condom use self‐efficacy among FSWs at… compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

HIV incidence among FSWs at 3‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom showed no clear difference in HIV incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Chlamydia incidence among FSWs at 3‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower chlamydia incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Gonorrhoea incidence among FSWs at 3‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower gonorrhoea incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Use of birth control methods (consistent condom use) · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower consistent male condom use at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Consistent female condom use by FSWs at 24‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower consistent female condom use by FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

2 findings from 1 review