Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

39 questions · 39 findings · 6 reviews

No studies found 3 · 7.7%GRADE not reported 23 · 59%Very low 1 · 2.6%Low 2 · 5.1%Moderate 8 · 20.5%High 2 · 5.1%

Surgery with excision of failed tape vs surgery without excision of tape

Objective cure rates in the longer‐term ‐ more than 12 months, · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Objective cure rates in the longer‐term ‐ more than 12 months, · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

One type of repeat midurethral tape vs another type of repeat midurethral tape

Objective cure rates in the longer‐term ‐ more than 12 months, · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Mortality: prone position vs supine

Subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: severe hypoxaemiaAlive or dead · adults with acute respiratory failure

Mortality: prone position probably leads to lower subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: severe hypoxaemiaAlive… compared with supine (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mortality: prone position vs supine

Subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: lower tidal volume ventilationAlive or dead · adults with acute respiratory failure

Mortality: prone position probably leads to lower subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: lower tidal volume… compared with supine (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mortality: prone position vs supine

Subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: ARDS onlyAlive or dead · adults with acute respiratory failure

Mortality: prone position showed no clear difference in subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: ARDS onlyAlive or dead compared with supine (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mortality: prone position vs supine

Subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: ≥ 16 hours/d proneAlive or dead · adults with acute respiratory failure

Mortality: prone position probably leads to lower subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: ≥ 16 hours/d proneAlive… compared with supine (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mortality: prone position vs supine

Subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: enrolment ≤ 48 hours after entry criteria/ventilationAlive or dead · adults with acute respiratory failure

Mortality: prone position probably leads to lower subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: enrolment ≤ 48 hours… compared with supine (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review