The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Laparaoscopic radical prostatectomy and robotic‐assisted… showed no clear difference in overall surgical complications (short‐term) compared with open radical prostatectomy (low certainty).
Posterior reconstruction showed no clear difference in urinary continence within 1 week after catheter removal MCID: 5%… compared with no posterior reconstruction (low certainty).
Posterior reconstruction showed no clear difference in urinary continence 3 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference compared with no posterior reconstruction (low certainty).
Posterior reconstruction showed no clear difference in serious adverse events compared with no posterior reconstruction (moderate certainty).
Posterior reconstruction showed no clear difference in urinary continence 6 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference compared with no posterior reconstruction (moderate certainty).
Posterior reconstruction showed no clear difference in urinary continence 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute… compared with no posterior reconstruction (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether posterior reconstruction changes potency recovery 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference compared with no posterior reconstruction (very low certainty).
Posterior reconstruction showed no clear difference in positive surgical margins MCID: 5% absolute difference compared with no posterior reconstruction (low certainty).
Retzius‐sparing RALP probably leads to higher urinary continence within 1 week after catheter removal MCID: 5%… compared with standard RALP (moderate certainty).
Retzius‐sparing RALP may leads to higher urinary continence 3 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference compared with standard RALP (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether retzius‐sparing RALP changes serious adverse events compared with standard RALP (very low certainty).
Retzius‐sparing RALP showed no clear difference in urinary continence 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute… compared with standard RALP (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether retzius‐sparing RALP changes potency 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference compared with standard RALP (very low certainty).
Retzius‐sparing RALP may leads to higher positive surgical margins MCID: 5% absolute difference compared with standard RALP (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether retzius‐sparing RALP changes biochemical recurrence‐free survival compared with standard RALP (very low certainty).