Question · asked by 1 review

Retzius‐sparing RALP vs standard RALP: Urinary continence 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference

Retzius‐sparing RALP showed no clear difference in urinary continence 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute… compared with standard RALP (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Retzius‐sparing RALP vs standard RALP
Urinary continence 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference · men (ages > 18 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer
Retzius‐sparing RALP showed no clear difference in urinary continence 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute… compared with standard RALP (moderate certainty).
Retzius‐sparing versus standard robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.01 [0.97, 1.04]2 studies · 222 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Retzius‐sparing versus standard robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.
2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.