Ulcers completely healed · people with venous leg ulcers
Sulodexide + local treatment may leads to higher proportion of ulcers completely healed (overall) compared with local treatment (low certainty).
4 findings from 1 review
RR 1.66 [1.3, 2.12]
3 studies · 438 participants
Low
RR 1.91 [1, 3.66]
1 study · 114 participants
Very low
RR 1.65 [1.2, 2.28]
2 studies · 324 participants
Low
Show 1 more finding
Economic: direct costs · people with venous leg ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Time to complete healing · people with venous leg ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Change in ulcer size · people with venous leg ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Recurrence of ulcers · people with venous leg ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse effects · people with venous leg ulcers
It is very uncertain whether sulodexide + local treatment changes adverse effects compared with local treatment (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life · people with venous leg ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices changes dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
Integrated securement dressings showed no clear difference in dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
Bordered polyurethane showed no clear difference in dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Malodour (smell score measured on a scale of 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating a more offensive smell) · treating malignant wounds
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 6 participants
Very low
Dislodgement/accidental removal Observation · Patients requiring a peripheral venous catheter
It is very uncertain whether transparent dressing changes dislodgement/accidental removal Observation compared with sticking plaster (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Dislodgement/accidental removal · Patients requiring a peripheral venous catheter
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes dislodgement/accidental removal (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dislodgement/accidental removal Observation · Patients requiring a peripheral venous catheter
It is very uncertain whether bordered transparent dressing changes dislodgement/accidental removal Observation compared with securement device (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dislodgement/accidental removal Observation · Patients requiring a peripheral venous catheter
It is very uncertain whether bordered transparent dressing changes dislodgement/accidental removal Observation compared with tape (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review