Electroacupuncture vs sham electroacupuncture
Electroacupuncture showed no clear difference in withdrawal due to adverse events compared with sham electroacupuncture (low certainty).
- OR 0.32 [0.01, 8.27]1 study · 36 participantsLow
Electroacupuncture showed no clear difference in withdrawal due to adverse events compared with sham electroacupuncture (low certainty).
Electroacupuncture showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with sham electroacupuncture (low certainty).
Electroacupuncture showed no clear difference in symptom scores of FD Graded by 4 levels1 compared with itopride (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether manual‐electroacupuncture changes symptom scores of FD Graded by 4 levels1 compared with domperidone (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether manual‐electroacupuncture changes symptom scores of ulceration subtype Graded by 4 levels1 compared with domperidone (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether manual‐electroacupuncture changes symptom scores of regurgitation subtype Graded by 4 levels1 compared with domperidone (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether manual‐electroacupuncture changes symptom scores of dyskinesia subtype Graded by 4 levels1 compared with domperidone (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether manual‐electroacupuncture changes symptom scores of nonspecific subtype Graded by 4 levels1 compared with domperidone (very low certainty).