evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 2 · 66.7%High 0 · 0%

Early routine ERCP strategy vs early conservative management with or without delayed or selective ERCP strategy

Death Analysis 1.1 · patients with unselected patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis

Early routine ERCP strategy showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality, ITT analysis compared with early conservative management with or without delayed or selective… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Early routine ERCP strategy vs early conservative management with or without delayed or selective ERCP strategy

Local complications defined by the Atlanta Classification (necrosis, abscess, pseudocyst) · patients with unselected patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis

Early routine ERCP strategy showed no clear difference in local complications defined by the Atlanta Classification (necrosis,… compared with early conservative management with or without delayed or selective… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Early routine ERCP strategy vs early conservative management with or without delayed or selective ERCP strategy

Systemic complications defined by the Atlanta Classification (organ failure including shock, pulmonary insufficiency, renal failure, and gastrointestinal bleeding; disseminated intravascular coagulation or severe metabolic disturbances) · patients with unselected patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis

Early routine ERCP strategy showed no clear difference in systemic complications defined by the Atlanta Classification (organ… compared with early conservative management with or without delayed or selective… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review