Question · asked by 1 review

Early routine ERCP strategy vs early conservative management with or without delayed or selective ERCP strategy: Death Analysis 1.1

Early routine ERCP strategy showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality, ITT analysis compared with early conservative management with or without delayed or selective… (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Early routine ERCP strategy vs early conservative management with or without delayed or selective ERCP strategy
All‐cause mortality, ITT analysis · patients with unselected patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis
Early routine ERCP strategy showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality, ITT analysis compared with early conservative management with or without delayed or selective… (low certainty).
Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management… (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.74 [0.18, 3.03]5 studies · 644 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone…
2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.