Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

8 questions · 8 findings · 2 reviews · Emergency and Critical Care · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 25%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 50%Low 2 · 25%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) vs usual care

Physical function · critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults

1 finding from 1 review

Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) for critically ill adults in the intensive care unit 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 104 participants
Low

Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) vs usual care

Adverse events Proportion of participants with one or more events, or proportion of intervention sessions where an event occurred (falls, accidental dislodgement of attachments, haemodynamic instability, oxygen desaturation or any other adverse ev... · critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults

1 finding from 1 review

Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) for critically ill adults in the intensive care unit 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 690 participants
Low

Automated monitoring systems vs usual care

Time to initiation of antimicrobial therapy (Time to initiation starts at the time of admission) · people admitted to intensive care units

It is very uncertain whether automated monitoring systems changes time to initiation of antimicrobial therapy (Time to initiation… compared with standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 1200 participants
Very low

Automated monitoring systems vs usual care

Time to initiation of fluid resuscitation (Time to initiation starts at the time of admission) · people admitted to intensive care units

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Automated monitoring systems vs usual care

30‐day mortality* · people admitted to intensive care units

It is very uncertain whether automated monitoring systems changes 30‐day mortality* compared with standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Automated monitoring systems vs usual care

Duration of ICU stay · people admitted to intensive care units

1 finding from 1 review

Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 442 participants
Very low

Automated monitoring systems vs usual care

Failed detection of sepsis (as reported by studies) · people admitted to intensive care units

1 finding from 1 review

Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 560 participants
Very low

Automated monitoring systems vs usual care

Quality of life measured at the latest available time point post‐discharge from ICU (preferred measure SF‐36 then EQ‐5D) · people admitted to intensive care units

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found