Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 2 reviews · Endodontics and dental trauma · All outcomes

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ceramic restoration material vs Porcelain-fused-to-metal restoration material

Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth

The pooled incidence with ceramic restorations was 5.59%.

1 finding from 1 review

Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations: a… 2023 All outcomes
Ceramic
Proportion 5.59 [2.89, 9.12]
460 participants
GRADE not reported

Direct composite resin restoration vs Full-coverage metal-ceramic crown

Clinical failure (post dislodgement) · Participants with endodontically-treated permanent premolars restored with a carbon-fibre post (Category III)

Direct composite restoration (final restoration) showed no clear difference in clinical failure (post dislodgement) compared with full-coverage metal-ceramic crown; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth 2007 · Cochrane All outcomes
36 months (3 years); dislodgement assessed at 24 months
RR 1.85 [0.17, 19.8]
1 study · 104 participants
GRADE not reported