Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,734 questions · 15,288 findings · 893 reviews

No studies found 3,864 · 25.3%GRADE not reported 2,222 · 14.5%Very low 3,868 · 25.3%Low 3,280 · 21.5%Moderate 1,676 · 11%High 378 · 2.5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG) · children under 5 years of age

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG) compared with routine care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles/MMR) ‐ household monetary incentivef · children under 5 years of age

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study… compared with routine care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐ service‐level monetary incentiveg · children under 5 years of age

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐… compared with routine care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐ household + service‐level monetary incentive · children under 5 years of age

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐… compared with routine care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines · children under 5 years of age

It is very uncertain whether monetary incentives changes proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all… compared with routine care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Health education vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG) · children under 5 years of age

Health education showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG) compared with routine care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital register vs usual care

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age

Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age compared with routine care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital register vs usual care

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age · children under 5 years of age

Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2… compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital register vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (OPV3) · children under 5 years of age

Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (OPV3) compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital register vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles) · children under 5 years of age

Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles) compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital register vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (HBV3) · children under 5 years of age

Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (HBV3) compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review