Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,771 questions · 10,185 findings · 893 reviews

No studies found 2,109 · 20.7%GRADE not reported 1,125 · 11%Very low 2,279 · 22.4%Low 2,514 · 24.7%Moderate 1,709 · 16.8%High 449 · 4.4%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

tDCS plus speech and language therapy (SLT) vs sham tDCS plus SLT

Functional communication · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke
2 findings from 1 review

tDCS plus speech and language therapy (SLT) vs sham tDCS plus SLT

Language impairment: accuracy of naming nouns at · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke
2 findings from 1 review

Physiotherapy (tongue-spatula jaw exercises) vs No active treatment (control)

Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · People of any age with a confirmed diagnosis, by clinical examination and biopsy, of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF)

It is very uncertain whether physiotherapy (tongue-spatula jaw exercises) changes maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) compared with no active treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control

Change in grip strength · women with early breast cancer

Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy showed no clear difference in change in grip strength from baseline to end of intervention compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review