Cochrane · systematic review · CD013167

Systemic therapies for preventing or treating aromatase inhibitor‐induced musculoskeletal symptoms in early breast cancer

Roberts, KE, Adsett, IT, Rickett, K, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library

Breast CancerAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
13
current version
GRADE rated
13
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 8 · 61.5%Low 5 · 38.5%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy compared to control for treating aromatase inhibitor‐induced musculoskeletal symptoms in women with early breast cancer

Population: women with early breast cancer
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in pain from baseline to end of intervention
Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control
no estimate extracted2 studies · 183 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Change in grip strength from baseline to end of intervention
Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control
RR 1.08 [0.37, 3.17]1 study · 137 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Safety of systemic therapies in AIMSS
Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control
no estimate extracted4 studies · 344 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Effect on discontinuation of aromatase inhibitors (AI)
Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control
RR 0.16 [0.01, 2.99]1 study · 147 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Effect on breast cancer‐specific quality of life (BCS‐QoL)
Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control
no estimate extracted1 study · 44 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) ‐ HRQoL: Total Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General(FACT‐G) score
Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control
no estimate extracted1 study · 1 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Incidence of AIMSS
Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control
RR 0.82 [0.63, 1.06]2 studies · 240 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness

Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy compared to control for preventing aromatase inhibitor‐induced musculoskeletal symptoms in women with early breast cancer

Population: health problem or population
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in pain from baseline to end of intervention
Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control
no estimate extracted10 studies · 1099 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias
Change in stiffness from baseline to end of intervention
Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control
no estimate extracted4 studies · 295 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Grip strength ‐ Vitamin D
Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control
no estimate extracted1 study · 1 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Effect on breast cancer‐specific quality of life (BCS‐QoL)
Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control
no estimate extracted2 studies · 147 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Effect on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL)
Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control
no estimate extracted3 studies · 208 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Safety of systemic therapies for the treatment of AIMSS
Summary of findings table ‐ Systemic therapy vs control
no estimate extracted10 studies · 1250 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias