Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,749 questions · 14,273 findings · 834 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3,655 · 25.6%GRADE not reported 2,115 · 14.8%Very low 3,646 · 25.5%Low 3,034 · 21.3%Moderate 1,503 · 10.5%High 320 · 2.2%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Active tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training

Adverse events · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 3 participants
Very low

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) vs active control‐site rTMS

Word retrieval · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) vs active control‐site rTMS

Overall language abilities · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 27 participants
Very low

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) vs active control‐site rTMS

Cognitive function · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 27 participants
Very low

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) vs active control‐site rTMS

Quality of life · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) vs active control‐site rTMS

Adverse events · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 27 participants
Very low

tDCS vs sham tDCS

Cognitive function · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

tDCS vs sham tDCS

Quality of life · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

tDCS vs sham tDCS

Adverse events · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 15 participants
Very low

Active tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training

Word retrieval · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 93 participants
Very low

Active tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training

Overall language abilities · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 28 participants
Very low

Active tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training

Cognitive function · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 37 participants
Very low

Active tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training

Quality of life · adults with primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 16 participants
Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Sodium modelling vs slow dialysis

Dialysis dysequilibrium syndrome · patients requiring haemodialysis

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing haemodialysis dysequilibrium syndrome 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 15 participants
Low

Summary of findings table ‐ High sodium dialysate vs standard sodium dialysate

Hospital stay — not reported · patients requiring haemodialysis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing haemodialysis dysequilibrium syndrome 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Sodium modelling vs slow dialysis

Severe dialysis dysequilibrium syndrome · patients requiring haemodialysis

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing haemodialysis dysequilibrium syndrome 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 15 participants
Low

Summary of findings table ‐ Sodium modelling vs slow dialysis

Death · patients requiring haemodialysis

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing haemodialysis dysequilibrium syndrome 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 15 participants
Low

Summary of findings table ‐ Sodium modelling vs slow dialysis

Adverse events · patients requiring haemodialysis

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Sodium modelling changes adverse events compared with slow dialysis (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing haemodialysis dysequilibrium syndrome 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.33 [0.15, 11.64]
1 study · 15 participants
Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Sodium modelling vs slow dialysis

Hospital stay — not reported · patients requiring haemodialysis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing haemodialysis dysequilibrium syndrome 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ High sodium dialysate vs standard sodium dialysate

Dialysis dysequilibrium syndrome · patients requiring haemodialysis

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ High sodium dialysate changes dialysis dysequilibrium syndrome compared with standard sodium dialysate (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing haemodialysis dysequilibrium syndrome 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.07 [0, 1.12]
1 study · 22 participants
Very low