What do systematic reviews say?

FIBRINOGEN: Prophylactic trials: intervention vs inactive control

• Pro‐coagulant haemostatic factors for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in people without haemophilia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 80 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings table: Art therapy vs active control

• Art therapy for people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 39 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table: Art therapy vs active control

• Art therapy for people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 39 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table: Art therapy vs active control

• Art therapy for people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 21 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table: Art therapy vs active control

• Art therapy for people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 39 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table: Art therapy vs active control

• Art therapy for people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 60 participants
  Very low

Grommets vs active monitoring

Grommets may leads to higher proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months… compared with active monitoring (low certainty).

• Grommets (ventilation tubes) for recurrent acute otitis media in children 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 9.49 [2.38, 37.8]
  1 study · 95 participants
  Low

Grommets vs active monitoring

• Grommets (ventilation tubes) for recurrent acute otitis media in children 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 54 participants
  Low

Grommets vs active monitoring

Grommets showed no clear difference in proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 12 months… compared with active monitoring (low certainty).

• Grommets (ventilation tubes) for recurrent acute otitis media in children 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.41 [1, 1.99]
  1 study · 200 participants
  Low

Grommets vs active monitoring

Grommets showed no clear difference in total number of AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation compared with active monitoring (low certainty).

• Grommets (ventilation tubes) for recurrent acute otitis media in children 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 95 participants
  Low

Grommets vs active monitoring

• Grommets (ventilation tubes) for recurrent acute otitis media in children 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 200 participants
  Low

Grommets vs active monitoring

• Grommets (ventilation tubes) for recurrent acute otitis media in children 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 85 participants
  Low

MBSR vs active control

• Mindfulness‐based stress reduction for family carers of people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 135 participants
  Low

MBSR vs active control

• Mindfulness‐based stress reduction for family carers of people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 78 participants
  Low

MBSR vs active control

• Mindfulness‐based stress reduction for family carers of people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 135 participants
  Low

MBSR vs active control

It is very uncertain whether MBSR changes dropout rates compared with active control (very low certainty).

• Mindfulness‐based stress reduction for family carers of people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.39 [0.32, 5.99]
  4 studies · 166 participants
  Very low

MBSR vs inactive control

• Mindfulness‐based stress reduction for family carers of people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 50 participants
  Low

MBSR vs inactive control

• Mindfulness‐based stress reduction for family carers of people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 33 participants
  Low

MBSR vs inactive control

• Mindfulness‐based stress reduction for family carers of people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 17 participants
  Very low

MBSR vs inactive control

It is very uncertain whether MBSR changes dropout rates compared with inactive control (very low certainty).

• Mindfulness‐based stress reduction for family carers of people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2 [0.21, 18.69]
  1 study · 20 participants
  Very low