Question · asked by 1 review

Grommets vs active monitoring: Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation

Grommets may leads to higher proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months… compared with active monitoring (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Grommets vs active monitoring
Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation
Grommets may leads to higher proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months… compared with active monitoring (low certainty).
Grommets (ventilation tubes) for recurrent acute otitis media in children (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 9.49 [2.38, 37.8]1 study · 95 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Grommets (ventilation tubes) for recurrent acute otitis media in children
2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.