Time to first BM (№ women with 1st BM on day 2 after delivery) · Women who had major abdominal gynaecologic surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Length of hospital stay · Women who had major abdominal gynaecologic surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Effectiveness of treatment · health problem or population
3 findings from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 43 participants
Low
no estimate extracted
1 study · 43 participants
Low
no estimate extracted
1 study · 43 participants
Very low
Adverse events · health problem or population
1 finding from 1 review
Psychological outcomes ‐ not reported · health problem or population
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life · health problem or population
2 findings from 1 review
Requirement for analgesia ‐ not reported · health problem or population
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Gas embolism · patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Solid organ injury · patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery
It is very uncertain whether direct trocar entry changes solid organ injury compared with veress needle entry (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Failed entry · patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery
Direct trocar entry probably leads to lower failed entry compared with veress needle entry (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
All‐cause mortality · patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Vascular injury (major vessels and abdominal wall vessels) · patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery
It is very uncertain whether direct trocar entry changes vascular injury (major vessels and abdominal wall vessels) compared with veress needle entry (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Visceral injury (bladder or bowel) · patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery
It is very uncertain whether direct trocar entry changes visceral injury (bladder or bowel) compared with veress needle entry (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Satisfaction with treatment up to 24 months · patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids
Uterine artery embolization (UAE) showed no clear difference in satisfaction with treatment up to 24 months compared with surgery (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Satisfaction with treatment at 5 years · patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids
Uterine artery embolization (UAE) showed no clear difference in satisfaction with treatment at 5 years compared with surgery (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Live birth · patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids
It is very uncertain whether uterine artery embolization (UAE) changes live birth ‐ UAE versus myomectomy compared with surgery (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events: intra‐procedural complications · patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids
Uterine artery embolization (UAE) showed no clear difference in adverse events: intra‐procedural complications compared with surgery (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events: minor post‐procedural complications within one year · patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids
Uterine artery embolization (UAE) probably leads to higher adverse events: minor post‐procedural complications within one year compared with surgery (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events: major post‐procedural complications within one year · patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids
Uterine artery embolization (UAE) showed no clear difference in adverse events: major post‐procedural complications within one year compared with surgery (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Further interventions within 2 years · patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids
Uterine artery embolization (UAE) probably leads to higher further interventions within 2 years compared with surgery (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review