Cochrane · systematic review · CD004508

Early versus delayed oral fluids and food for reducing complications after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery

Charoenkwan, K, Matovinovic, E · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library

Gynaecology and FertilityAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 6 · 85.7%High 1 · 14.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Early oral feeding compared to delayed oral feeding for women who had major abdominal gynaecologic surgery

Population: Women who had major abdominal gynaecologic surgery
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Postoperative ileus
Early oral feeding vs delayed oral feeding
RR 0.47 [0.17, 1.29]3 studies · 279 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Nausea or vomiting or both
Early oral feeding vs delayed oral feeding
RR 1.03 [0.64, 1.67]4 studies · 484 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Time to bowel sounds [days]
Early oral feeding vs delayed oral feeding
no estimate extracted2 studies · 338 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Time to the passage of flatus [days]
Early oral feeding vs delayed oral feeding
no estimate extracted3 studies · 444 participantsHigh
Time to the first solid diet [days]
Early oral feeding vs delayed oral feeding
no estimate extracted2 studies · 301 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Time to first passage of stool [days]
Early oral feeding vs delayed oral feeding
no estimate extracted2 studies · 249 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Hospital stay [days]
Early oral feeding vs delayed oral feeding
no estimate extracted4 studies · 484 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias