False‐negative rate in women with dense breasts · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography probably leads to lower false‐negative rate in women with dense breasts compared with mammography alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Biopsy rate in women with dense breasts · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography leads to higher biopsy rate in women with dense breasts compared with mammography alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Outcomes after 1‐ to 2‐year · breast cancer screening (non‐dense breasts)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Incremental cancer detection for women with non‐dense breasts: cohort studies · breast cancer screening (non‐dense breasts)
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography probably leads to higher incremental cancer detection for women with non‐dense breasts: RCT compared with mammography alone (moderate certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Interval cancer · breast cancer screening (non‐dense breasts)
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography showed no clear difference in interval cancer compared with mammography alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
False‐positive rate in women with non‐dense breasts · breast cancer screening (non‐dense breasts)
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography leads to higher false‐positive rate in women with non‐dense breasts compared with mammography alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
False‐negative rate in women with non‐dense breasts · breast cancer screening (non‐dense breasts)
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography probably leads to lower false‐negative rate in women with non‐dense breasts compared with mammography alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Biopsy rate in women with non‐dense breasts · breast cancer screening (non‐dense breasts)
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography leads to higher biopsy rate in women with non‐dense breasts compared with mammography alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Index test result · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
False positives (participants incorrectly classified as having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
124 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
Index Test result · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
True positives (participants with tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
4 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
False negatives (participants incorrectly classified as not having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
True negatives (participants without tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
648 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
False positives (participants incorrectly classified as having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
347 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
Index Test result · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
True positives (participants with tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
5 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
False negatives (participants incorrectly classified as not having tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
True negatives (participants without tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
887 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
True positives (participants with tuberculosis disease) · of people with HIV‐negative or unknown HIV status who are considered eligible for systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Role of…
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2 participants
Very low