Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

330 questions · 337 findings · 33 reviews

No studies found 96 · 28.5%GRADE not reported 53 · 15.7%Very low 80 · 23.7%Low 63 · 18.7%Moderate 39 · 11.6%High 6 · 1.8%

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such

Adverse outcomes ‐ all · patients with proximal femoral fracture

It is very uncertain whether advanced haemodynamic monitoring changes adverse outcomes ‐ all compared with protocol using standard measures such (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual vs quality of gastric residual alone

Number of infants with feed interruption episodes (lasting ≥ 12 hours) · feed interruption while monitoring gastric residual

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual changes number of infants with feed interruption episodes (lasting ≥ 12 hours) compared with quality of gastric residual alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Shunting vs no shunting

Stroke‐related death within 30 days of surgery (best‐case) · patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease

Shunting may leads to lower stroke‐related death within 30 days of surgery (best‐case) compared with no shunting (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Shunting vs no shunting

Stroke‐related death within 30 days of surgery (worst‐case) · patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease

Shunting showed no clear difference in stroke‐related death within 30 days of surgery (worst‐case) compared with no shunting (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve outcomes vs treatment guided by clinical assessment alone?

All‐cause mortality · patients with heart failure

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve… showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with treatment guided by clinical assessment alone? (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve outcomes vs treatment guided by clinical assessment alone?

Heart failure mortality · patients with heart failure

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve… showed no clear difference in heart failure mortality compared with treatment guided by clinical assessment alone? (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve outcomes vs treatment guided by clinical assessment alone?

Heart failure hospitalisation (RR) · patients with heart failure

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve… may leads to lower heart failure admissions compared with treatment guided by clinical assessment alone? (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve outcomes vs treatment guided by clinical assessment alone?

Hospital admissions · patients with heart failure

Does treatment guided by serial BNP or NT‐proBNP monitoring improve… showed no clear difference in all‐cause admissions compared with treatment guided by clinical assessment alone? (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review