Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

842 questions · 924 findings · 54 reviews

No studies found 215 · 23.3%GRADE not reported 127 · 13.7%Very low 212 · 22.9%Low 208 · 22.5%Moderate 130 · 14.1%High 32 · 3.5%

Slum / urban-disadvantaged setting vs Non-slum urban / general-urban / national population

Ever utilised dental services · Adult residents of slums and non-slum urban settings of LMICs

Ever-use of dental services is low-to-moderate (17%-71%) and generally lower in slum/rural groups; ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

Slum / urban-disadvantaged setting vs Non-slum urban / general-urban / national population

Periodontal disease prevalence · Adult residents of slums and non-slum urban settings of LMICs

Periodontal disease prevalence is high (23%-99%) across LMIC urban/slum populations; ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

Slum / urban-disadvantaged setting vs Non-slum urban / general-urban / national population

Dental service utilisation within the past year · Adult residents of slums and non-slum urban settings of LMICs

Past-year dental service use varies widely (4%-72%); ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

Slum / urban-disadvantaged setting vs Non-slum urban setting

Determinants of oral diseases · Adult residents of slums and non-slum urban settings of LMICs

Older age, lower education and income, poor oral hygiene, and disadvantaged residential setting were associated with oral diseases; directions varied across studies.

1 finding from 1 review