Question · asked by 1 review

Slum / urban-disadvantaged setting vs Non-slum urban / general-urban / national population: Periodontal disease prevalence

Periodontal disease prevalence is high (23%-99%) across LMIC urban/slum populations; ungraded.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Slum / urban-disadvantaged setting vs Non-slum urban / general-urban / national population
Periodontal disease prevalence · Adult residents of slums and non-slum urban settings of LMICs · Cross-sectional, Urban slums and non-slum/general-urban settings, LMICs
Periodontal disease prevalence is high (23%-99%) across LMIC urban/slum populations; ungraded.
Systematic review of oral health in slums and non-slum urban settings of Low and Middle-Income Countries… (2024) All outcomes
Periodontal disease affected all ages, was more pronounced in older groups, and ranged from 23% to 99%, generally higher than dental caries; bleeding gum/gingivitis contributed the largest component.9 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Systematic review of oral health in slums and non-slum urban settings of Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs): Disease prevalence,…
2024 All outcomes
June 2023 (Scopus and Web of Science searched March 2024)23Not applicable

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.