Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

246 questions · 255 findings · 32 reviews

No studies found 52 · 20.4%GRADE not reported 17 · 6.7%Very low 66 · 25.9%Low 62 · 24.3%Moderate 48 · 18.8%High 10 · 3.9%

High vs standard volume of fortified human milk or preterm formula

Extrauterine growth restriction at discharge · preterm or low birth weight infants

High showed no clear difference in extrauterine growth restriction at discharge compared with standard volume of fortified human milk or preterm formula (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

High vs standard volume of fortified human milk or preterm formula

Necrotising enterocolitis · preterm or low birth weight infants

It is very uncertain whether high changes necrotising enterocolitis compared with standard volume of fortified human milk or preterm formula (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prophylaxis with standard therapeutic factor concentrate vs pegylated liposome FVIII formulation

Annualized joint Bleeding Rate (AjBR) · children or adults with hemophilia A

Prophylaxis with standard therapeutic factor concentrate showed no clear difference in AJBR compared with pegylated liposome FVIII formulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prophylaxis with standard therapeutic factor concentrate vs pegylated liposome FVIII formulation

ABR · children or adults with hemophilia A

Prophylaxis with standard therapeutic factor concentrate showed no clear difference in ABR compared with pegylated liposome FVIII formulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid vs 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) (mesalazine)

Failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic remission · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis

Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid showed no clear difference in failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic remission compared with comparator 5‐aminosalicylic acid formulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid vs 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) (mesalazine)

Withdrawals due to adverse events · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis

It is very uncertain whether oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid changes withdrawal due to adverse events compared with comparator 5‐aminosalicylic acid formulation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid vs 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) (mesalazine)

Exclusion/withdrawal after entry · Patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis

Oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid showed no clear difference in exclusion/withdrawal after entry compared with comparator 5‐aminosalicylic acid formulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) provided at a dose that meets total daily nutritional requirements vs RUTF using an alternative formulation

Relapse during intervention defined as admission to inpatient therapeutic care, remain wasted, and dropouts during intervention period · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (and mixed HIV comorbidity), some of whom had been stabilised as inpatients pre‐trial

Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) leads to lower relapse during intervention defined as admission to inpatient… compared with RUTF using an alternative formulation (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) provided at a dose that meets total daily nutritional requirements vs RUTF using an alternative formulation

Mortality during intervention · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (and mixed HIV comorbidity), some of whom had been stabilised as inpatients pre‐trial

Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) showed no clear difference in mortality during intervention compared with RUTF using an alternative formulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) provided at a dose that meets total daily nutritional requirements vs RUTF using an alternative formulation

Rate of weight gain (g/kg/day) · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (and mixed HIV comorbidity), some of whom had been stabilised as inpatients pre‐trial
1 finding from 1 review

Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) provided at a dose that meets total daily nutritional requirements vs RUTF using an alternative formulation

Recovery during intervention defined as weight gain ≥ 15% in relation to baseline weight, absence of complications and oedema, and MUAC > 110 mm in 2 studies; MUAC > 12.4 cm without oedema in 1 study; WHZ ≥ 80% for two consecutive visits in 1 stud... · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (and mixed HIV comorbidity), some of whom had been stabilised as inpatients pre‐trial

Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) showed no clear difference in recovery during intervention defined as weight gain ≥ 15% in… compared with RUTF using an alternative formulation (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review