Adverse events ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Pain relief (percentage relief compared to baseline) · children and young adults with SCD
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Pain intensity (visual analogue score from 0 to 10 where 10 is the most severe pain) · children and young adults with SCD
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes pain intensity (visual analogue score from 0 to 10 where 10 is the… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Frequency of pain episodes · children and young adults with SCD
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Change in consumption of analgesics (number of participants requiring analgesia) · children and young adults with SCD
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Change in QoL · children and young adults with SCD
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Change in ability to cope with ADL · children and young adults with SCD
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Adverse effects · children and young adults with SCD
1 finding from 1 review
Deep vein thrombosis · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
NMES showed no clear difference in total DVT compared with alternative prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
PE · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
NMES showed no clear difference in PE compared with no prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Total VTE · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
NMES may leads to lower total VTE compared with no prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Bleeding (major and minor) · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
1 finding from 1 review
Deep vein thrombosis · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
NMES may leads to higher total DVT compared with low‐dose heparin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Asymptomatic DVT · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
NMES showed no clear difference in asymptomatic DVT compared with low‐dose heparin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Symptomatic DVT · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
NMES showed no clear difference in symptomatic DVT compared with low‐dose heparin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
PE · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
1 finding from 1 review
Total VTE · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
1 finding from 1 review
Bleeding (major and minor) · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
1 finding from 1 review
Deep vein thrombosis · participants at risk of venous thromboembolism
NMES showed no clear difference in total DVT compared with dextran 40 (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review