Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2,209 questions · 2,322 findings · 227 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 644 · 27.7%GRADE not reported 135 · 5.8%Very low 591 · 25.5%Low 582 · 25.1%Moderate 309 · 13.3%High 61 · 2.6%

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.2.1 Includes functional training versus does not include functional training Motor function scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 188 participants
Low

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.2.2 Includes neurophysiological versus does not include neurophysiological Motor function scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
8 studies · 506 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.2.3 Includes musculoskeletal versus does not include musculoskeletal Motor function scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 81 participants
Low

Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces

Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · preventing pressure ulcers

It is very uncertain whether reactive fibre surfaces changes proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with foam surfaces (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.86 [0.47, 1.57]
1 study · 68 participants
Very low

Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces

Time to pressure ulcer development · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces

Support surface associated patient comfort · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces

All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces

Health‐related quality of life · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces

Cost‐effectiveness · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme vs no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme

Time spent walking (minutes per week, activity monitor) · people with NMD

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with neuromuscular disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 25 participants
Very low

A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme vs no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme

Quality of life (SF‐12 PCS) · people with NMD

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with neuromuscular disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 35 participants
Very low

A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme vs no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme

Quality of life (SF‐12 MCS) · people with NMD

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with neuromuscular disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 35 participants
Low

A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme vs no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme

Adverse events/serious adverse events · people with NMD

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with neuromuscular disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Acupuncture combined with other active therapy vs other active therapy

Participant‐reported pain intensity VAS (0‐10, lower score = less pain) · adults with neuropathic pain

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 104 participants
Very low

Acupuncture combined with other active therapy vs other active therapy

At least 50% reduction in pain · adults with neuropathic pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Acupuncture combined with other active therapy vs other active therapy

Number of participants experiencing any serious adverse events · adults with neuropathic pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Acupuncture combined with other active therapy vs other active therapy

Quality of life FACT/the GOG‐Ntx questionnaire scores (0 ‐ 100, lower score = better) · adults with neuropathic pain

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 104 participants
Low

Active drain vs passive drain

Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing elective pancreatic resections

It is very uncertain whether active drain changes intra‐abdominal infection compared with passive drain following pancreatic surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.87 [0.21, 3.66]
2 studies · 321 participants
Very low

Active drain vs passive drain

Wound infection · people undergoing elective pancreatic resections

It is very uncertain whether active drain changes wound infection compared with passive drain following pancreatic surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.92 [0.44, 1.9]
2 studies · 321 participants
Very low

Active drain vs passive drain

Drain‐related complications · people undergoing elective pancreatic resections

1 finding from 1 review

Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 223 participants
Very low