Cochrane · systematic review · CD013544
Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with neuromuscular disease
Jones, K, Hawke, F, Newman, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library
NeuromuscularAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
13
current version
GRADE rated
9
No studies
4
Included studies
NR
No studies 4 · 30.8%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 15.4%Low 7 · 53.8%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
A physical activity programme (weight‐bearing) compared to no physical activity programme in people living with NMD
Population: people with NMD
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Time spent walking (minutes per week, activity monitor) A physical activity programme (weight‐bearing) vs no physical activity programme | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 69 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Time spent walking (minutes per week, activity monitor) A physical activity programme (weight‐bearing) vs no physical activity programme | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 74 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Time spent walking (minutes per week, activity monitor) A physical activity programme (weight‐bearing) vs no physical activity programme | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 70 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of life A physical activity programme (weight‐bearing) vs no physical activity programme | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Adverse events/serious adverse events A physical activity programme (weight‐bearing) vs no physical activity programme | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme compared to no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme in people living with NMD
Population: people with NMD
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Time spent walking (hours per 48 hours, activity monitor) A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme vs no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 25 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of life (SF‐12 PCS) A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme vs no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 35 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of life (SF‐12 MCS) A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme vs no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 35 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Adverse events/serious adverse events A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme vs no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
A functional programme compared to a stretching programme in people living with NMD
Population: people with NMD
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Physical activity (unspecified count per day, activity monitor) A functional programme vs a stretching programme | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 43 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of life (SF‐36 PCS) A functional programme vs a stretching programme | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 49 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of life (SF‐36 MCS) A functional programme vs a stretching programme | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 49 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Adverse events/serious adverse events A functional programme vs a stretching programme | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |