Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.27 (95% CI 0.49 to 3.30).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.27 [0.49, 3.30]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.89 (95% CI 0.23 to 3.48).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.89 [0.23, 3.48]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Dental caries in primary teeth · Children (primary dentition) worldwide
In Australia, the pooled prevalence of primary-teeth caries in children was 28.5% (95% CI 20.3 to 38.5); certainty not graded.
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between AG + GG genotype (G-allele carriers) vs AA genotype of ENAM rs1264848 and dental caries susceptibility (AG + GG vs AA model: OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.78-3.68) in the Ethnicity: Mixed subgroup; certainty not graded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Intervention not reported
Microleakage/infiltration index: Er,Cr:YSGG vs traditional bur
1 finding from 1 review
Qualitative NR [NR, NR]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Marginal integrity success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Dental caries in permanent teeth · Children (permanent dentition) worldwide
In Africa, the pooled prevalence of permanent-teeth caries in children was 58.9% (95% CI 29.4 to 83.1); certainty not graded.
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
rs1126478 showed no significant association with dental caries under a co-dominant model (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.32; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Marginal integrity success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC + CT genotype of AMELX rs946252 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC + CT model: OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.19-2.87) in the Control group: Caries-free subgroup; certainty not graded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Incidence of microleakage · Er,Cr:YSGG laser-prepared cavities restored with etch-and-rinse adhesive systems (in vitro)
Prior acid etching with etch-and-rinse adhesives did not significantly change microleakage after Er,Cr:YSGG preparation (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.63-2.22; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.18 [0.63, 2.22]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between T allele vs C allele of AMELX rs6639060 and dental caries susceptibility (T vs C model: OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.63-1.85) in the Ethnicity: Caucasian subgroup; certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Anatomic form success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Absence of recurrent caries success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Marginal integrity success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Poor oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) · Children aged 3-12 years
Children aged 3 years had higher odds of poor OHRQoL than older children (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.42-2.57; 2 studies; ungraded).
2 findings from 1 review
OR 2.00 [1.42, 2.57]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
OR 2.13 [1.50, 2.76]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Age group: Children (n=4) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.99 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.23).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.99 [0.81, 1.23]
4 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.92 (95% CI 0.24 to 3.58).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.92 [0.24, 3.58]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC genotype of AMELX rs2106416 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC model: OR 1.83, 95% CI 0.47-7.06); certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC + CT genotype of ENAM rs3796703 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC + CT model: OR 2.90, 95% CI 0.92-9.12); certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review