Injury Incidence Rate (injuries / 1000 person‐days)a · military personnel
Running shoes recommended and selected on foot posture showed no clear difference in injury Incidence Rate (injuries / 1000 person‐days)a compared with running shoes not recommended and selected on foot posture (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of runners who failed to return to running or their previous level of running · military personnel
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Runner satisfaction with footwear · military personnel
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events (e.g. skin complaints) other than musculoskeletal injuries · military personnel
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of runners requiring hospital admission or surgery, or both, for musculoskeletal injury or adverse event · military personnel
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of runners who failed to return to running or their previous level of running · healthy adults participating in recreational running
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Runner satisfaction with footwear · healthy adults participating in recreational running
Neutral / cushioned showed no clear difference in runner satisfaction with footwear compared with minimalist running shoes (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (e.g. skin complaints) other than musculoskeletal injuries · healthy adults participating in recreational running
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of runners requiring hospital admission or surgery, or both, for musculoskeletal injury or adverse event · healthy adults participating in recreational running
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of runners who failed to return to running or their previous level of running · healthy adults participating in recreational running
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Limb function at 6 or 12 months · adults with open long bone fractures; study in the review included only Gustilo II open tibia fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
HRQoL at 6 or 12 months · adults with open long bone fractures; study in the review included only Gustilo II open tibia fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Deep surgical site infection at 30 days or 90 days, or time points reported by study authors · adults with open long bone fractures; study in the review included only Gustilo II open tibia fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Delayed or non‐union at time points reported by study authors · adults with open long bone fractures; study in the review included only Gustilo II open tibia fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Unplanned operations at 12 months · adults with open long bone fractures; study in the review included only Gustilo II open tibia fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Adverse events: superficial infection · adults with open long bone fractures; study in the review included only Gustilo II open tibia fractures
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes adverse events: superficial infection (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Return to work by 12 months · adults with open long bone fractures; study in the review included only Gustilo II open tibia fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACVD)-related events (morbidity and mortality) · Adults (any age) with a known number of remaining teeth, followed prospectively in cohort studies
In prospective cohorts, adults with 11-16 teeth had a higher cumulative incidence of ACVD-related events than adults with 25-32 teeth (RR 2.27, 95% CI 1.55 to 3.32; 4 cohort studies, I2=87%); GRADE per-analysis ratings reported in Supplementary File 7 (not available in provided sources).
1 finding from 1 review
All-cause mortality (ACM) · Adults (any age) with a known number of remaining teeth, followed prospectively in cohort studies
In prospective cohorts, the multivariable-adjusted HR for all-cause mortality in edentulous adults (0 teeth) vs adults with 1-32 teeth was 1.30 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.40; 7 studies, I2=20%); GRADE per-analysis ratings reported in Supplementary File 7 (not available in provided sources).
4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACVD)-related events (morbidity and mortality) · Adults (any age) with a known number of remaining teeth, followed prospectively in cohort studies
In prospective cohorts, adults with 17-24 teeth had a higher cumulative incidence of ACVD-related events than adults with 25-32 teeth (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.45; 4 cohort studies, I2=87%); GRADE per-analysis ratings reported in Supplementary File 7 (not available in provided sources).
1 finding from 1 review