Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,372 questions · 3,874 findings · 666 reviews

No studies found 431 · 11.1%GRADE not reported 783 · 20.2%Very low 995 · 25.7%Low 909 · 23.5%Moderate 596 · 15.4%High 160 · 4.1%

Intervention not reported

Mortality sensitivity analysis (calculated instead of overall survival) ‐ without UK NCRI Rapid trial and MSKCC trial #90‐44due to high risk of other bias

The intervention probably leads to lower mortality sensitivity analysis (calculated instead of overall… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Joint mobility Range of motion Scale from 0°‐135° (higher number reflects better outcome) · people with neurological conditions1
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Participation restrictions 100 mm return to usual work activities VAS (higher score reflects better outcome) · people with non‐neurological conditions1
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Activity limitations 18‐point upper limb scale (higher score reflects better outcome) · people with neurological conditions1
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Joint mobility Range of motion Scale from 0°‐90° (higher number reflects better outcome) · people with non‐neurological conditions1
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life 160‐point Burn Specific Health Scale‐Brief questionnaire (higher score reflects better outcome) · people with non‐neurological conditions1
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive rehabilitation vs Conventional treatment

Functional independence · Treating patients with traumatic brain injury

It is very uncertain whether cognitive rehabilitation changes independence in ADL FIM, with 18 items in basic and psychosocial… compared with conventional treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pseudoelastic orthosis vs traditional (static) splint

Spasticity at up to 6 hours after treatment (measured by the Ashworth Scale, 0‐, with a higher score indicating greater spasticity) · children/young people aged 4‐18 years with traumatic brain injury and with 'mild to severe spastic tetraparesis' (weakness) in all limbs
1 finding from 1 review

Local corticosteroid injection (LCI) vs a control strategy (no treatment, placebo or waiting list controls)

Heel pain: VAS 0 to 100 (higher scores = worse pain) ‐ short‐term · Adults with plantar heel pain¹

Local steroid injection showed no clear difference in heel pain: VAS 0 to 100 (higher scores = worse pain) ‐ short‐term compared with placebo or no treatment control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review