Question · asked by 1 review
Pseudoelastic orthosis vs traditional (static) splint: Spasticity at up to 6 hours after treatment (measured by the Ashworth Scale, 0‐, with a higher score indicating greater spasticity)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Pseudoelastic orthosis vs traditional (static) splint Spasticity at up to 6 hours after treatment (measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale, 0‐4, with a higher score indicating greater spasticity) · children/young people aged 4‐18 years with traumatic brain injury and with 'mild to severe spastic tetraparesis'… Interventions for managing skeletal muscle spasticity following traumatic brain injury (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 25 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for managing skeletal muscle spasticity following traumatic brain injury 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.