What do systematic reviews say?

Intervention not reported

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 45 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  18 studies · 1220 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 177 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 72 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

CBT vs waiting list control

It is very uncertain whether CBT changes depression scales (BDI‐II, HAM‐D and HADS); higher score means more… compared with wait‐list control (very low certainty).

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for depression in adults and children with traumatic brain injury 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 146 participants
  Very low

CBT vs supportive psychotherapy

It is very uncertain whether CBT changes beck Depression Inventory (BDI); higher score means more depressed compared with supportive Psychotherapy (very low certainty).

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for depression in adults and children with traumatic brain injury 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 48 participants
  Very low

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) vs rTMS plus Tricyclic Anti‐depressant

It is very uncertain whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) changes hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM‐D); higher score means… compared with rTMS plus Tricyclic Anti‐depressant (very low certainty).

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for depression in adults and children with traumatic brain injury 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 63 participants
  Very low

Supervised exercised vs exercise

Supervised exercised showed no clear difference in beck Depression Inventory (BDI); higher score means more depression compared with exercise (low certainty).

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for depression in adults and children with traumatic brain injury 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 77 participants
  Low

Intervention not reported

• Pharmacological interventions for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 20 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Pharmacological interventions for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 20 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Pharmacological interventions for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 20 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Pharmacological interventions for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 20 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Pharmacological interventions for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 20 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Pharmacological interventions for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 20 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Pharmacological interventions for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Pharmacological interventions for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Pharmacological interventions for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Donepezil vs placebo

• Pharmacological interventions for cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 165 participants
  Low