Short‐term remission · adults with panic disorder
All psychological therapies showed no clear difference in short‐term remission compared with tricyclic antidepressants (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Short‐term response · adults with panic disorder
All psychological therapies showed no clear difference in short‐term response compared with tricyclic antidepressants (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Leaving the study early · adults with panic disorder
All psychological therapies showed no clear difference in dropouts for any reason compared with tricyclic antidepressants (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Long‐term remission/response · adults with panic disorder
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Clinical improvement in pulse rate · adults with schizophrenia or related disorders treated for clozapine‐induced tachycardia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Improvement in heart rate · adults with schizophrenia or related disorders treated for clozapine‐induced tachycardia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Duration of hospitalisation · adults with schizophrenia or related disorders treated for clozapine‐induced tachycardia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Clinically important adverse events · adults with schizophrenia or related disorders treated for clozapine‐induced tachycardia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Patient satisfaction · adults with schizophrenia or related disorders treated for clozapine‐induced tachycardia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in overall seizure frequency) · people with epilepsy and intellectual disability
The intervention may leads to higher responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in overall seizure frequency) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in rate of drop seizures) · people with epilepsy and intellectual disability
The intervention showed no clear difference in responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in rate of drop seizures) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse events 4 studies reported the frequency of self reported adverse events in the AED and placebo groups The results show a trend in favour of the placebo groups · people with epilepsy and intellectual disability
The intervention showed no clear difference in adverse events 4 studies reported the frequency of self reported… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Although a higher percentage of people in the ATL and aCCT groups fell within Class I (seizure free) and Class II (> 50% reduction in seizures), no significant differences in seizure frequency were noted between the groups at 2 years after surgery... · people with temporal lobe epilepsy and intellectual disabilities
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Co‐operation during induction ‐ Video 'fairytale' vs. no audiovisual aid (Passive) ICC = 0 (perfect vs. poor‐moderate compliance) · children
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes co‐operation during induction ‐ Video 'fairytale' vs. no audiovisual… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Co‐operation during induction ‐ 2 parents vs. 1 parent Poor compliance: ICC > 6 · children
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes co‐operation during induction ‐ 2 parents vs. 1 parent Poor… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Anxiety during induction ‐ Parental presence vs. midazolam mYPAS. Scale from: 1 to 100. · children
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Co‐operation during induction ‐ Parental presence vs. midazolam Poor compliance: ICC > 6 · children
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes co‐operation during induction ‐ Parental presence vs. midazolam Poor… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Co‐operation during induction ‐ Low sensory stimulation vs. control (Passive) ICC = 0 · children
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes co‐operation during induction ‐ Low sensory stimulation vs. control… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Co‐operation during induction ‐ Mask introduction/exposure (Mask) ICC (number of children compliant) · children
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes co‐operation during induction ‐ Mask introduction/exposure (Mask)… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Anxiety during induction ‐ Video game vs. midazolam (Interactive) mYPAS. Scale from: 1 to 100. · children
1 finding from 1 review