Cochrane · systematic review · CD005399

Pharmacological interventions for epilepsy in people with intellectual disabilities

Jackson, CF, Makin, SM, Marson, AG, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library

EpilepsyAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 60%Moderate 2 · 40%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Comparison

Population: people with epilepsy and intellectual disability
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Retention on treatment Duration of retention on treatment was not reported in these studies. The retention on treatment in this analysis is assessed by the number of withdrawals in the intervention and placebo groups The results show a trend in fa...
RR 1.43 [0.76, 2.69]3 studies · 310 participantsModerate
Seizure freedom 1 study reported the incidence of seizure frequency in the intervention and placebo group The results show a trend in favour of the AED group
RR 2.92 [0.32, 26.77]1 study · 73 participantsLow
Responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in overall seizure frequency)
RR 2.58 [1.6, 4.14]3 studies · 382 participantsLow
Responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in rate of drop seizures)
RR 6.04 [0.27, 133.89]2 studies · 313 participantsLow
Adverse events 4 studies reported the frequency of self reported adverse events in the AED and placebo groups The results show a trend in favour of the placebo groups
RR 1.13 [0.95, 1.35]4 studies · 527 participantsModerate