Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2,038 questions · 2,118 findings · 339 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 323 · 15.3%GRADE not reported 166 · 7.8%Very low 552 · 26.1%Low 592 · 28%Moderate 340 · 16.1%High 145 · 6.8%

Intervention not reported

Post‐thrombotic syndrome (late, 5 years · patients diagnosed with acute DVT

The intervention probably leads to lower post‐thrombotic syndrome (late, 5 years (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thrombolytic strategies versus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.56 [0.43, 0.73]
2 studies · 211 participants
Moderate

Calf, quadriceps, and hamstring stretching vs no stretching

Cramp frequency (number of cramps in preceding week) (after 6 weeks) · 50‐ to 60‐year‐old women with metabolic syndrome

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Calf, quadriceps, and hamstring stretching vs no stretching

Adverse events · 50‐ to 60‐year‐old women with metabolic syndrome

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 24 participants
Moderate

Calf, quadriceps, and hamstring stretching vs no stretching

Cramp severity (0 to 10 VAS; higher = more pain) (after 6 weeks) · 50‐ to 60‐year‐old women with metabolic syndrome

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Calf, quadriceps, and hamstring stretching vs no stretching

Proportion of participants experiencing cramps · 50‐ to 60‐year‐old women with metabolic syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Calf, quadriceps, and hamstring stretching vs no stretching

Health‐related quality of life · 50‐ to 60‐year‐old women with metabolic syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Calf, quadriceps, and hamstring stretching vs no stretching

Quality of sleep · 50‐ to 60‐year‐old women with metabolic syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Calf, quadriceps, and hamstring stretching vs no stretching

Activities of daily living · 50‐ to 60‐year‐old women with metabolic syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

High protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Rate of weight gain (g/kg/day) · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 114 participants
Low

Very high protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Necrotising enterocolitis · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Weight gain · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 77 participants
Moderate

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Linear growth (cm/week) · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 77 participants
Moderate

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Growth: head circumference (cm/week) · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

IQ score and Bayley score at 18 months or later · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Necrotising enterocolitis · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

High protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Linear growth (cm/week) · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 48 participants
Low

High protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Growth: head circumference (cm/week) · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 18 participants
Very low

High protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

IQ score and Bayley score at 18 months or later · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

High protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Necrotising enterocolitis · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 46 participants
Low

Very high protein vs low protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

Weight gain · formula‐fed low birth weight infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found