Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

515 questions in 31 reviews · Fertility Regulation

current versions
No studies 99 · 19.2%Ungraded 11 · 2.1%Very low 70 · 13.6%Low 147 · 28.5%Moderate 153 · 29.7%High 35 · 6.8%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Summary of findings: partial salpingectomy vs clip
Technical failures · women requesting postpartum or interval sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.18 [0.08, 0.4]1 study · 2198 participantsModerate
Summary of findings: partial salpingectomy vs clip
Failure rate: total (12 months) · women requesting postpartum or interval sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.212 studies · 3537 participantsModerate
Summary of findings: partial salpingectomy vs clip
Complaints (12 months) · women requesting postpartum or interval sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.3 [0.92, 1.82]1 study · 2137 participantsModerate
Summary of findings: Hulka clip vs Filshie clip
Minor morbidity: total · women requesting sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.14 [0, 7.32]1 study · 197 participantsLow
Summary of findings: Hulka clip vs Filshie clip
Minor morbidity: procedure‐related injuries · women requesting sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.55 [0.73, 3.26]2 studies · 2322 participantsModerate
Summary of findings: Hulka clip vs Filshie clip
Technical failures · women requesting sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.04 [0.1, 11.33]2 studies · 2325 participantsLow
Summary of findings: Hulka clip vs Filshie clip
Failure rate: total (12 months) · women requesting sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 6.2 [0.75, 51.66]1 study · 1441 participantsModerate
Summary of findings: ring vs clip
Minor morbidity: details ‐ procedure‐related injuries · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.95 [1.36, 2.78]3 studies · 3575 participantsHigh
Summary of findings: Hulka clip vs Filshie clip
Complaints: postoperative pain (24 hours) · women requesting sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.74 [0.99, 3.03]1 study · 197 participantsLow
Summary of findings: ring vs clip
Technical failures · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 3.93 [2.43, 6.35]3 studies · 3476 participantsHigh
Summary of findings: ring vs clip
Failure rate: details (12 to 24 months) · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.72 [0.33, 1.57]4 studies · 3822 participantsHigh
Summary of findings: ring vs clip
Complaints: Postoperative pain (24 hours) · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.14 [0.88, 1.48]3 studies · 922 participantsHigh
Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation
Major morbidity: total · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 2.87 [1.13, 7.25]2 studies · 1905 participantsLow
Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation
Major morbidity: procedure‐related injuries requiring additional operation or blood transfusion · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.9 [0.19, 18.96]2 studies · 1905 participantsLow
Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation
Major morbidity: rehospitalisation as a consequence of the operation · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation
Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation (2016) · Cochrane
OR 5.74 [0.73, 45.09]1 study · 295 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Unintended pregnancy · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.81, 1.26]2 studies · 3440 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Use of birth control methods (consistent condom use) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.95 [0.7, 5.44]3 studies · 826 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Use of birth control methods (hormonal contraceptives) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.72, 1.43]3 studies · 3987 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Sexually Transmitted Diseases · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.76 [0.27, 2.14]2 studies · 420 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Unintended pregnancy · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 9 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.66 [0.5, 0.87]4 studies · 1905 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Initiation of sexual intercourse (mixed gender) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 9 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.74, 1.32]4 studies · 1796 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Use of birth control methods (condom use in last sex) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 9 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.95, 1.06]3 studies · 796 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Use of birth control methods (consistent condom use) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 9 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.21 [0.95, 1.54]5 studies · 1681 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Sexually Transmitted Diseases · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 9 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.65, 1.22]2 studies · 699 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Use of birth control methods (condom use in last sex) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.87, 1.04]2 studies · 3091 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Use of birth control methods (hormonal contraceptives) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 2.22 [1.07, 4.62]2 studies · 3091 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Sexually Transmitted Diseases · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.92 [0.75, 1.13]2 studies · 3440 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Use of birth control methods (condom use at last sex) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.18 [1.06, 1.32]2 studies · 1431 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Initiation of sexual intercourse (mixed gender) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.71, 1.27]2 studies · 672 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Unintended pregnancy · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.5 [0.23, 1.09]5 studies · 3149 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Initiation of sexual intercourse (mixed gender) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.84 [0.68, 1.04]7 studies · 8608 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Use of birth control methods (condom use at last sex) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.93, 1.09]4 studies · 2620 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Second birth in 2 years · adolescents and women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.41 [0.17, 1]2006 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Risk avoidance group, unprotected sex at last sex: at 3 months; > 15 months · adolescents and women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.7 [0.52, 0.93]2012 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Risk reduction group, unprotected sex at last sex; sex without condom in past 3 months (at 3 months) · adolescents and women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.67 [0.47, 0.96]2012 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Less use of ineffective contraception: at 1 month; at 4 months · women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.49 [0.28, 0.87]2011 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Use of effective contraception in past 3 months: at 3 months; at 9 months · women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
OR 2.12 [1.53, 2.92]2007 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Less use of ineffective contraception (at 3 months) · women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.31 [0.12, 0.77]2013 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
LARC uptake by 4 weeks; LARC use at 3 months · women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
OR 3.99 [1.36, 11.68]2016 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Consistency of hormonal contraceptive use at: 12 months; 18 months; 24 months · adolescents and women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.46 [1.13, 1.89]2013 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Consistency of condom use at: 12 months; 24 months · adolescents and women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.45 [1.26, 1.67]2013 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Consistency of dual method use (OCs + condoms) at: 12 months; 24 months · adolescents and women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.58 [1.03, 2.43]2013 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Use of effective contraceptive method: at 7 months after baseline (after year 1 sessions); at 19 months after baseline (12 months after year 2 sessions) · adolescents and women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2001 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Condom use at last sex: at 7 months after baseline; at 19 months after baseline · adolescents and women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2001 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Frequency of sex without condom in past 3 months: at 7 months after baseline; at 19 months after baseline · adolescents and women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2001 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Condom use at last sex (at 6 months after baseline) · adolescents and women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
OR 2.12 [1.24, 3.56]2006 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Less frequent sex without condom in past 3 months (at 6 months after baseline) · adolescents and women with need for contraception
Theory‐based interventions for contraception (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2006 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Pregnancy · women with need for contraception
Hormonal contraceptives for contraception in overweight or obese women (2016) · Cochrane
RR 2.49 [1.01, 6.13]1139 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Pregnancy · women with need for contraception
Hormonal contraceptives for contraception in overweight or obese women (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted16282 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Change in body fat (%) by 6 months; change in lean body mass (%) by 6 months · women with need for contraception
Progestin‐only contraceptives: effects on weight (2016) · Cochrane
MD 11 [2.64, 19.36]26 participantsLow