Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

153 questions · 160 findings · 18 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 42 · 26.3%GRADE not reported 8 · 5%Very low 37 · 23.1%Low 59 · 36.9%Moderate 14 · 8.8%High 0 · 0%

Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation vs the Ahmed drainage implant

Mean number of antiglaucoma medications at 1‐year · adults with refractory glaucoma

1 finding from 1 review

Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 54 participants
Very low

Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation vs the Ahmed drainage implant

Adverse events 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma

1 finding from 1 review

Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 68 participants
Very low

Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation vs the Ahmed drainage implant

Mean change in quality of life scores 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Micropulse vs continuous‐wave cyclophotocoagulation

Pain control · adults with refractory glaucoma

1 finding from 1 review

Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 44 participants
GRADE not reported

Micropulse vs continuous‐wave cyclophotocoagulation

Mean change in IOP measured in mmHg 12 months postintervention · adults with refractory glaucoma

1 finding from 1 review

Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 48 participants
GRADE not reported

Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation

Outcomes* · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cyclodestructive procedures for non‐refractory glaucoma 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation

Control of intraocular pressure · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery

Low‐ showed no clear difference in control of intraocular pressure compared with high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cyclodestructive procedures for non‐refractory glaucoma 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.03 [0.64, 1.65]
1 study · 79 participants
Low

Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation

Mean change in intraocular pressure · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery

1 finding from 1 review

Cyclodestructive procedures for non‐refractory glaucoma 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 79 participants
Low

Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation

Decrease in visual acuity · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery

Low‐ showed no clear difference in decrease in visual acuity compared with high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cyclodestructive procedures for non‐refractory glaucoma 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.22 [0.54, 2.76]
1 study · 79 participants
Low

Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation

Mean visual field · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cyclodestructive procedures for non‐refractory glaucoma 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation

Mean number of antiglaucoma medications at 1‐year · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery

1 finding from 1 review

Cyclodestructive procedures for non‐refractory glaucoma 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 79 participants
Moderate

Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation

Proportion needing additional glaucoma surgery at 1‐year · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery

Low‐ showed no clear difference in additional glaucoma surgery compared with high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cyclodestructive procedures for non‐refractory glaucoma 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.76 [0.31, 1.84]
1 study · 79 participants
Low

Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation

Adverse events: atonic pupil · people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery

Low‐ showed no clear difference in adverse events: atonic pupil compared with high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cyclodestructive procedures for non‐refractory glaucoma 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.89 [0.47, 1.68]
1 study · 92 participants
Low