Cochrane · systematic review · CD009313
Cyclodestructive procedures for non‐refractory glaucoma
Michelessi, M, Bicket, AK, Lindsley, K · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library
Eyes and VisionAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
8
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 25%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 5 · 62.5%Moderate 1 · 12.5%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Low‐ versus high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation for non‐refractory glaucoma
Population: people with primary open‐angle glaucoma and no previous glaucoma surgery
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Outcomes* Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Control of intraocular pressure Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation | RR 1.03 [0.64, 1.65] | 1 study · 79 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Mean change in intraocular pressure Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 79 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Decrease in visual acuity Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation | RR 1.22 [0.54, 2.76] | 1 study · 79 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Mean visual field Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Number of glaucoma medications after treatment Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 79 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Additional glaucoma surgery Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation | RR 0.76 [0.31, 1.84] | 1 study · 79 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Adverse events: atonic pupil Low‐ vs high‐energy diode trans‐scleral cyclophotocoagulation | RR 0.89 [0.47, 1.68] | 1 study · 92 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |