Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,841 questions · 1,893 findings · 109 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 546 · 28.8%GRADE not reported 117 · 6.2%Very low 613 · 32.4%Low 473 · 25%Moderate 118 · 6.2%High 26 · 1.4%

Reflexology vs sham

Reduction in depression · chronic pain in MS

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 71 participants
Very low

Reflexology vs sham

Reduction in Spasms · chronic pain in MS

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 71 participants
Very low

TENS vs sham

Quality of life · chronic back pain in MS

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 90 participants
Very low

Ai Chi Exercises vs sham

Reduction in pain intensity · chronic musculoskeletal pain in people with MS

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 73 participants
Very low

Ai Chi Exercises vs sham

Reduction in disability · chronic musculoskeletal pain in people with MS

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 73 participants
Very low

Ai Chi Exercises vs sham

Quality of life · chronic musculoskeletal pain in people with MS

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 73 participants
Very low

Ai Chi Exercises vs sham

Reduction in fatigue · chronic musculoskeletal pain in people with MS

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 73 participants
Very low

tDCS vs sham

Reduction in pain intensity · chronic neuropathic pain in MS

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 35 participants
Very low

tDCS vs sham

Reduction in fatigue · chronic neuropathic pain in MS

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 16 participants
Very low

Vaginal PGE₂ vs placebo or expectant management

Vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours · patients with induction of labour at term

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Intracervical PGE₂ vs placebo

Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · women requiring induction of labour

Intracervical PGE₂ showed no clear difference in uterine hyperstimulation (with fetal heart rate changes) compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.66 [0.63, 11.25]
4 studies · 488 participants
Low

Intracervical PGE₂ vs placebo

Caesarean section · women requiring induction of labour

Intracervical PGE₂ showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.9 [0.72, 1.12]
7 studies · 674 participants
Moderate

Intracervical PGE₂ vs placebo

Neonatal death or serious neonatal perinatal morbidity · women requiring induction of labour

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Intracervical PGE₂ vs placebo

Serious maternal morbidity or death · women requiring induction of labour

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Intracervical PGE₂ vs placebo

Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · women requiring induction of labour

Intracervical PGE₂ showed no clear difference in neonatal intensive care unit admission compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.61 [0.43, 6.05]
3 studies · 215 participants
Low

Vaginal misoprostol vs placebo

Vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours · women requiring induction of labour

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Vaginal misoprostol vs placebo

Vaginal birth not achieved in 48 to 72 h · women requiring induction of labour

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Vaginal misoprostol vs placebo

Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · women requiring induction of labour

Vaginal misoprostol showed no clear difference in uterine hyperstimulation (with fetal heart rate changes) compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.97 [0.43, 9]
3 studies · 265 participants
Low

Vaginal misoprostol vs placebo

Caesarean section · women requiring induction of labour

Vaginal misoprostol showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.94 [0.61, 1.46]
4 studies · 325 participants
Low

Vaginal misoprostol vs placebo

Neonatal death or serious neonatal perinatal morbidity · women requiring induction of labour

Vaginal misoprostol showed no clear difference in serious neonatal morbidity or death compared with placebo (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.34 [0.01, 8.14]
1 study · 77 participants
Low