Antibiotics vs placebo
Antibiotics leads to lower clinical failure compared with placebo (high certainty).
- Peto OR 0.48 [0.36, 0.63]12 studies · 2603 participantsHigh
Antibiotics leads to lower clinical failure compared with placebo (high certainty).
Single herb plus conventional intervention may leads to higher visual acuity (gain of ≥ 2 lines) (end of treatment) compared with conventional intervention (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether single herb plus conventional intervention changes reduction in microaneurysms compared with conventional intervention (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether single herb plus conventional intervention changes observations in retina: reduction in haemorrhages compared with conventional intervention (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine changes overall response rate compared with vandetanib (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine changes grade 1 ‐ 4 anaemia compared with vandetanib (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine plus cisplatin changes all‐cause mortality at 1 year compared with S‐1 plus cisplatin (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine plus cisplatin changes overall response rate compared with S‐1 plus cisplatin (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine plus cisplatin changes grade 1 ‐ 4 anaemia compared with S‐1 plus cisplatin (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine plus S‐1 changes all‐cause mortality at 1 year compared with S‐1 (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine plus vandetanib changes serious adverse events compared with vandetanib (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine plus S‐1 changes serious adverse events compared with S‐1 (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.