Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,808 questions · 8,953 findings · 827 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 1,891 · 21.1%GRADE not reported 380 · 4.2%Very low 2,100 · 23.5%Low 2,449 · 27.4%Moderate 1,684 · 18.8%High 449 · 5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham

Major adverse events · men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggesting benign prostatic hyperplasia

It is very uncertain whether convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy changes major adverse events compared with sham procedure (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham

Retreatment · men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggesting benign prostatic hyperplasia

It is very uncertain whether convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy changes retreatment compared with sham procedure (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery vs preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery

Non‐surgical therapy for recurrent or persistent diseaseRadiation therapy and/or pharmacologic therapy for recurrent or persistent disease · adults with growth‐hormone secreting pituitary adenomas

It is very uncertain whether surgery alone changes non‐surgical therapy for recurrent or persistent diseaseRadiation… compared with preoperative pharmacological therapy and surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Death or stroke · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment probably leads to higher death or stroke compared with conventional medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Long‐term ipsilateral stroke · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment probably leads to higher ipsilateral stroke compared with conventional medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Type of recurrent event · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment showed no clear difference in type of recurrent event compared with conventional medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Death · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment may leads to higher death compared with conventional medical treatment alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Dependency · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment showed no clear difference in dependency compared with conventional medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review