Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,751 questions · 12,775 findings · 807 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 3,413 · 26.7%GRADE not reported 709 · 5.5%Very low 3,483 · 27.3%Low 3,165 · 24.8%Moderate 1,628 · 12.7%High 377 · 3%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

Pain (PIPP) · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in PIPP during endotracheal suctioning Range of scale 0 to 21. Lower… compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

Heart rate · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in heart rate compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

SaO 2 during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in saO 2 during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

SDB during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in SDB during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

SRB during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch may leads to higher SRB during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Doxepin cream vs oral antihistamine

Change in burn‐related pruritus (VAS) ( · people with postburn pruritus

Doxepin cream showed no clear difference in change in burn‐related pruritus (VAS) ( compared with oral antihistamine (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ondansetron vs diphenhydramine

Change in burn‐related pruritus (VAS) ( · people with postburn pruritus

Ondansetron showed no clear difference in change in burn‐related pruritus (NAS) ( compared with diphenhydramine (antihistamine) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Enalapril ointment vs placebo

Change in burn‐related pruritus (VAS) ( · people with postburn pruritus

Enalapril ointment showed no clear difference in change in burn‐related pruritus (Scoring table for itching) ( compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review