Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,589 questions in 168 reviews · Schizophrenia

current versions
No studies 601 · 23.2%Ungraded 446 · 17.2%Very low 721 · 27.8%Low 505 · 19.5%Moderate 274 · 10.6%High 42 · 1.6%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Peer support plus standard care vs clinician‐led support plus standard care
Peer outcomes: clinically important change in quality of life for service user and peer supporter · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness
Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Peer support plus standard care vs clinician‐led support plus standard care
Adverse events: all cause · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness
Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Peer support plus standard care vs clinician‐led support plus standard care
Economic: indirect costs (cost to society) · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness
Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Peer support plus standard care vs standard care
Service use: days in hospital – medium term · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness
Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Peer support plus standard care vs standard care
Global state: relapse · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness
Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Peer support plus standard care vs standard care
Global state: clinically important change in global state · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness
Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Peer support plus standard care vs standard care
Peer outcomes: clinically important change in quality of life for service user and peer supporter · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness
Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Peer support plus standard care vs standard care
Adverse events: all cause – long term · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness
Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.52 [0.43, 5.31]1 study · 555 participantsVery low
Peer support plus standard care vs standard care
Economic: indirect costs (cost to society) · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness
Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Peer support plus standard care vs clinician‐led support plus standard care
Service use: hospital admission · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness
Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Peer support plus standard care vs clinician‐led support plus standard care
Service use: days in hospital · people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness
Peer support for people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Global state: clinically important change in global state · people with primary delusional infestation
Treatments for primary delusional infestation (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Global state: relapse · people with primary delusional infestation
Treatments for primary delusional infestation (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Mental state: clinically important change in mental state · people with primary delusional infestation
Treatments for primary delusional infestation (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Behaviour: clinically important change in general behaviour · people with primary delusional infestation
Treatments for primary delusional infestation (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Behaviour: occurrence of violent incidents (to self, others, or property) · people with primary delusional infestation
Treatments for primary delusional infestation (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Adverse events: any adverse events requiring hospitalisation · people with primary delusional infestation
Treatments for primary delusional infestation (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Quality of life: clinically important change in quality/satisfaction of life · people with primary delusional infestation
Treatments for primary delusional infestation (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 participantsUngraded
Haloperidol discontinuation vs haloperidol continuation
Global state: clinically important change ‒ not improved (CGI) · schizophrenia
Haloperidol discontinuation for people with schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
RR 2.06 [1.33, 3.2]1 study · 49 participantsVery low
Haloperidol discontinuation vs haloperidol continuation
Global state: relapse: ‒ · schizophrenia
Haloperidol discontinuation for people with schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.8 [1.18, 2.74]4 studies · 165 participantsVery low
Haloperidol discontinuation vs haloperidol continuation
Mental state: clinically important change in general mental state · schizophrenia
Haloperidol discontinuation for people with schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Haloperidol discontinuation vs haloperidol continuation
General functioning: clinically important change in general functioning including working ability · schizophrenia
Haloperidol discontinuation for people with schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Haloperidol discontinuation vs haloperidol continuation
General behaviour: clinically important change in general behaviour · schizophrenia
Haloperidol discontinuation for people with schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Haloperidol discontinuation vs haloperidol continuation
Quality of life: clinically important change in quality of life · schizophrenia
Haloperidol discontinuation for people with schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Haloperidol discontinuation vs haloperidol continuation
Satisfaction with treatment: leaving the study early · schizophrenia
Haloperidol discontinuation for people with schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.13 [0.01, 2.28]1 study · 43 participantsVery low
ECT plus standard care vs sham‐ECT plus standard care
Response to treatment Clinically important response to treatment as defined by each study · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT plus standard care vs antipsychotics plus standard care
Satisfaction and acceptability of treatment ‐ leaving the study early · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT plus standard care vs antipsychotics plus standard care
Mental state (short term) ‐ total scores (BPRS, high = poor) · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 162 participantsVery low
ECT plus standard care vs antipsychotics plus standard care
General functioning Clinically important change in general functioning as defined by each study · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT plus standard care vs antipsychotics plus standard care
Service use ‐ hospitalisation · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT plus standard care vs antipsychotics plus standard care
Adverse event/effect(s) ‐ death · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT plus standard care vs standard care
Response to treatment (medium term) Clinically important response to treatment as defined by each study · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
RR 2.06 [1.75, 2.42]9 studies · 819 participantsModerate
ECT plus standard care vs standard care
Cognitive functioning (short term) ‐ memory deterioration · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
RR 27 [1.67, 437.68]1 study · 72 participantsVery low
ECT plus standard care vs standard care
Satisfaction and acceptability of treatment (medium term) ‐ leaving the study early · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.18 [0.38, 3.63]3 studies · 354 participantsVery low
ECT plus standard care vs standard care
Mental state (medium term) ‐ total scores (BPRS, high = poor) · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 345 participantsLow
ECT plus standard care vs standard care
General functioning (medium term) ‐ average scores (GAF, high = good) · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 97 participantsVery low
ECT plus standard care vs sham‐ECT plus standard care
Cognitive functioning Clinically important change in cognitive functioning as defined by each study · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT plus standard care vs standard care
Service use ‐ hospitalisation · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT plus standard care vs standard care
Adverse event/effect(s) ‐ death · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT alone vs antipsychotics
Response to treatment Clinically significant response to treatment as defined by each study · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT alone vs antipsychotics
Cognitive functioning Clinically important change in cognitive functioning as defined by each study · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT alone vs antipsychotics
Satisfaction and acceptability of treatment ‐ leaving the study early · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT alone vs antipsychotics
Mental state (medium term) ‐ total scores (BPRS, high = poor) · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
ECT alone vs antipsychotics
General functioning (medium term) ‐ average scores (GAF, high = good) · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
ECT alone vs antipsychotics
Service use ‐ hospitalisation · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT alone vs antipsychotics
Adverse event/effect(s) ‐ death · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT plus standard care vs sham‐ECT plus standard care
Satisfaction and acceptability of treatment ‐ leaving the study early · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT plus standard care vs sham‐ECT plus standard care
Mental state (short term) ‐ total scores (BPRS, high = poor) · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 25 participantsVery low
ECT plus standard care vs sham‐ECT plus standard care
General functioning Clinically important change in general functioning as defined by each study · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ECT plus standard care vs sham‐ECT plus standard care
Service use (short term) ‐ hospitalisation (number readmitted) · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
Electroconvulsive therapy for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.29 [0.1, 0.85]1 study · 25 participantsLow