Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

729 questions in 45 reviews · Consumers and Communication

current versions
No studies 188 · 25.8%Ungraded 93 · 12.8%Very low 155 · 21.3%Low 189 · 25.9%Moderate 90 · 12.3%High 14 · 1.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital targeted client communication (pregnant and postpartum women)
Health behaviour change: breastfeeding (exclusive breastfeeding at 9 weeks) · pregnant and postpartum women
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving maternal, neonatal, and child health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.92 [0.79, 1.07]1 study · 42 participantsLow
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard care or no intervention
Health status ‐ STI rate · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication
Health status ‐ Abortion rate · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication
Health behaviour change ‐ contraceptive use · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication
Health service utilization · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication
Unintended consequences · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication
SRH knowledge · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication
Health status and well‐being ‐ STI incidence (chlamydia) · Adolescents and youth age 14‐24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.61 [0.28, 1.33]1 study · 200 participantsLow
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication
Health behaviour change ‐ Condom use · Adolescents and youth age 14‐24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
OR 1.12 [0.7, 1.78]3 studies · 507 participantsVery low
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication
Health status ‐ Abortion rate · Adolescents and youth age 14‐24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication
Health behaviour change ‐ Contraceptive use at last sex · Adolescents and youth age 14‐24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
OR 1.41 study · 59 participantsVery low
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication
Health service utilization ‐ Clinic attendance for STI/HIV testing (self‐report) · Adolescents and youth age 14‐24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.61 [1.08, 2.4]2 studies · 498 participantsLow
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard care or no intervention
Health behaviour change ‐ Condom use · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.8 [0.54, 1.18]1 study · 385 participantsVery low
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication
Unintended consequences · Adolescents and youth age 14‐24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 200 participantsLow
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication
SRH knowledge · Adolescents and youth age 14‐24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.752 studies · 417 participantsVery low
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard care or no intervention
Health status ‐ STI rate · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard care or no intervention
Health behaviour change ‐ Condom use 50% of the time · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.94 [1, 3.78]1 study · 73 participantsVery low
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard care or no intervention
Health status and well‐being ‐ Repeat abortion following an earlier abortion · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.68 [0.28, 1.66]1 study · 328 participantsLow
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard care or no intervention
Health behaviour change ‐ Use of effective contraception method · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [0.92, 1.48]1 study · 327 participantsLow
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard care or no intervention
Health service utilization · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [1.04, 1.31]10 studies · 4014 participantsLow
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard care or no intervention
Unintended consequences · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 2915 participantsLow
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication
Health status ‐ STI rate · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication
Health behaviour change ‐ Condom use · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard care or no intervention
Health status ‐ Abortion rate · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication
Health status ‐ Abortion rate · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication
Health behaviour change ‐ Contraceptive use · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication
Health service utilization ‐ attendance for: breast cancer screening, cervical screening, voluntary medical male circumcision, HPV or HBV vaccination · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.12 [0.92, 1.35]3 studies · 1130 participantsLow
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication
Unintended consequences · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication
Health status ‐ STI rate · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication
Health behaviour change ‐ Condom use · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication
Health status ‐ Abortion rate · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication
Health behaviour change ‐ Contraceptive use · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication
Health service utilization · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.71 [0.67, 4.38]2 studies · 2150 participantsLow
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication
Unintended consequences · Adults (age over 24 years)
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard care or no intervention
Health behaviour change ‐ Oral contraception use · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.19 [1.05, 1.35]1 study · 683 participantsLow
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard care or no intervention
Health service utilization ‐ Clinic attendance for STI/HIV testing · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.5 [0.85, 2.65]1 study · 385 participantsVery low
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard care or no intervention
Unintended consequences · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 632 participantsVery low
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard care or no intervention
SRH knowledge · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.45 [1.23, 1.71]1 study · 385 participantsLow
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication
Health status ‐ STI rate · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication
Health behaviour change ‐condom use · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Outcomes* · informal caregivers of people affected by cancer
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Any adverse events · informal caregivers of people affected by cancer
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Outcomes* · individuals with cancer (patients)
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Global quality of life FLIC total score (Blanchard 1996), FACT‐G total score (Northouse 2007). Additional studies (reported in comments section): FACT‐B physical functioning subscale (Baucom 2009). EPIC multiple subscales and overall scores (Campb... · individuals with cancer (patients)
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 292 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Global quality of life FLIC total score (Blanchard 1996), EORTC‐QLQ‐C30 global health status score (Ledderer 2013), FACT‐G total score (Northouse 2007). Additional study (reported in comments section): FACT‐B physical functioning subscale (Baucom ... · individuals with cancer (patients)
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 294 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Any adverse events · individuals with cancer (patients)
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Global quality of life score Mulitple measures used. Caregiver Strain Index (Campbell 2007)** FACT‐G total score (Northouse 2007). Additional studies (reported in comments section): SF20 subscales (Blanchard 1996) SF36 social functioning subscale ... · informal caregivers of people affected by cancer
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 265 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Global quality of life score Multiple measures used. WHO‐Five‐Wellbeing Index (Ledderer 2013) FACT‐G total score (Northouse 2007). Additional study (reported in comments section): SF20 subscales (Blanchard 1996). Higher scores indicate better QoL · informal caregivers of people affected by cancer
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 239 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Any depression Multiple measures used. CES‐D (Blanchard 1996; Kozachik 2001; Kuijer 2004; Kurtz 2005; McCorkle 2007). POMS Depression subscale (Bultz 2000; Campbell 2007). HADS‐D (Nicolaisen 2018; Robertson 2016). Additional study (reported in com... · informal caregivers of people affected by cancer
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted9 studies · 702 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Any depression Multiple measures used. CES‐D (Blanchard 1996;McCorkle 2007). POMS Depression subscale (Bultz 2000). HADS‐D (Nicolaisen 2018; Robertson 2016). Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression. Folllow‐up: Three to six months post‐... · informal caregivers of people affected by cancer
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 379 participantsLow